Thanks Yichao, and thank you very much for the links.
On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 5:38:58 PM UTC+1, Yichao Yu wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Cristóvão Duarte Sousa > <cri...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > Thanks, Yichao. > > > > Rereading my first question and reading your second answer I think may > have > > been not clear in the first one. > > In the first question, I wanted to ask not about the current state but > > rather about the future goal of the development. > > Is your "no" about the current state or are you saying it is not a > future > > goal at all? > > It's "no" in that I don't think anyone is working on it or planning to > work on it so it's not part of "current thread support development". > We'll likely add that later but the first "stable" version of > threading support will unlikely support that. > > Relevant issues, https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/16134 and > (more accurately) https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/17573 > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 4:37:18 PM UTC+1, Yichao Yu wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Now, let me ask two questions. > >>> - Will the current thread support development allow embedding Julia > into > >>> multiple threads (even if it is as multiple instances)? > >> > >> > >> No. > >> > >>> > >>> - What are my options **today**, if any, to somehow overcome this > >>> limitation? > >> > >> > >> You can only call julia runtime/code from a single thread and this is > >> unlikely to change until we have non-experimental threading support. > How you > >> serialize calls to julia code or whether that's feasible is strongly > >> application dependent. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >> > >> > > >
