Don't look at me, I swear it was just a simple change in the return type of a function---they should have used a parametric type definition. Another $1billion down the drain...
Best, --Tim On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Michele Zaffalon < michele.zaffa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tim Holy: I had hoped you learnt to be more careful with untested > versions. See what happened this time around: https://www.theguardian.com/ > science/2016/oct/20/bad-day-for-space-probes-one-lost-on- > mars-another-in-safe-mode-at-jupiter? > > On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 at 5:27:52 PM UTC+2, Tim Holy wrote: >> >> "Sorry, sir, but our Mars probe crashed. It's a complete loss." >> >> "Oh no! Why?" >> >> "Well, just before it was about to dock, Tim Holy tagged a new version of >> Images. Turns out it had a bug in it that prevented the cameras from >> saving >> images to disk. So we were flying blind. We tried rolling back to an >> earlier >> version, but recent changes to Pkg meant that `pin` wasn't working >> either. So >> we hit the planet." >> >> "Next time, don't run master." >> >> --Tim >> >> On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 08:12:35 AM John Myles White wrote: >> > Not that I’m aware of. I’d say the thread is probably off-topic. >> > >> > — John >> > >> > On Sep 24, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Stefan Karpinski <ste...@karpinski.org> >> wrote: >> > > Is there any evidence that Julia was used to accomplish that? >> > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:05 AM, John Myles White >> > > <johnmyl...@gmail.com> wrote: I think this is the flight to Mars >> that >> > > India just finsihed. >> > > >> > > — John >> > > >> > > On Sep 24, 2014, at 8:04 AM, Stefan Karpinski <ste...@karpinski.org> >> wrote: >> > >> I have no idea what this is about. Can you clarify? >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:47 AM, K Leo <cnbi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> for the wonderful achievement with Mangalyaan! >> > >> >> > >> With a budget less than a Hollywood movie, I bet they must have >> largely >> > >> used (and supported?) open sources - Julia included? >> >>