Cool, thank you. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Yichao Yu <yyc1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Cedric St-Jean <cedric.stj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > It would make sense to put .jl file-parsing code in a separate, > > community-maintained module, because the rules for finding which file a > > module corresponds to are not trivial, and can change over time (they > became > > case-sensitive in 0.5) > > > > It's too bad that > > > > macro module_parser(m) > > m > > end > > > > @module_parser module X > > a = 10 > > end > > julia> macro m(m) > Expr(:toplevel, m) > end > @m (macro with 1 method) > > julia> @m module A > end > A > > > > > > is a syntax error, because it would be cleaner for instrumentation, and > for > > augmenting Julia's syntax. > > > > Cédric > > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Andreas Lobinger <lobing...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello colleague, > >> > >> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:50:44 AM UTC+2, Cedric St-Jean > wrote: > >>> > >>> I faced very similar issues with ClobberingReload.jl. > >>> https://github.com/cstjean/ClobberingReload.jl/blob/ > master/src/ClobberingReload.jl > >>> Check out parse_file (courtesy of @stevengj), parse_module, and > creload. I > >>> haven't "expanded" the includes, but it seems straight-forward to do > with a > >>> comprehension. > >> > >> > >> Thank you. I shortlisted the 'reload' mechanisms anyway, but > >> ClobberingReload seems new. Actually i was wondering, if i'm the first > one > >> to look into code instrumentation. This should be really straight > forward in > >> julia (i did it once in f77 and that clearly not straight forward...). > > > > >
