On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 8:39:15 AM UTC, Chris Rackauckas wrote: > > > This could be a terrible idea, I don't know. > I don't think so. In the download page there is already a choice of (two extra.. when JuliaBox is thought of as such) "distributions", if you will:
"We provide several ways for you to run Julia: - In the terminal using the built-in Julia command line. - The Juno <http://www.junolab.org> integrated development environment (IDE). - In the browser on JuliaBox.com" <https://www.juliabox.com> That is Juno includes Julia (from memory), so you could have a combinatorial explosion.. core packages in a distributions x possible IDEs x possible debuggers.. I'm all for a MATLAB like distribution that can compete, with Juno I guess (JuliaComputing promotes Ecplise IDE integration..). I hope people can agree on something, and avoid a combinatorial explosion. For myself, I really like julia-lite to be available (it is unofficially). -- Palli. I think it's great that
