Re: [julia-users] code design question – best ideomatic way to define nested types?

[Michael Krabbe Borregaard]

First, apologies, I didn't mean that you wanted to 'subvert' (
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subvert) julia. As a non-native
speaker the finer nuances of English sometimes slip. The word I was looking
for was perhaps 'sidestep'.
Also I see your point that as long as the Abstract type cannot be
instantiated, the problem with putting supertypes in an array should not be
relevant. So perhaps this is actually a nice general solution to the issue.