Did you post your full Pkg.status() yet? Is something keeping you stuck on
StatsFuns 0.2.x? The only new upper bound I see in the METADATA versions is
from https://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl/pull/5613
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:09:07 PM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>
> Okay, here is the same thing but from my METADATA.
>
> Code:
>
> metadata_dir = "/home/tim/.julia/v0.4/METADATA"
> for (pkg, version) in Pkg.installed()
>
> reqfile = joinpath(metadata_dir, pkg, "versions", string(version),
> "requires")
>
> if isfile(reqfile)
> lines = open(readlines, reqfile)
> println("#"^20)
> println(pkg)
> for line in lines
> print(line)
> end
> println("")
> end
> end
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:17:28 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>
>> I hate to have to say "RTFM" about this so often, but see
>> http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/strings/#version-number-literals.
>>
>> The trailing dash means including prereleases of the given version.
>> (Considering how unintuitive this is we should probably transition to
>> something clearer when we redesign Pkg.) The first number given is an
>> inclusive lower bound, and if a second number is given then it's an
>> exclusive upper bound.
>>
>> I see a few packages applying upper bounds to ForwardDiff, and a few to
>> MathProgBase and ReverseDiffSparse. I may have missed something (were these
>> taken from METADATA or the package directory? It should be the former,
>> sorry if I didn't say as much - METADATA can be changed after-the-fact but
>> tagged package content can't) but those don't look like they would conflict.
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 10:03:27 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>>>
>>> I wrote the script and put the output in the attached file.
>>>
>>> I assume that the '-' at the end of a dep is an upperbound?
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:35:46 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, will do!
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:31:25 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a bug somewhere with that error message, I've seen it points
>>>>> at the wrong package. If we can come up with a reproducible test case
>>>>> here
>>>>> it'll help for fixing the bug and making that message more useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's almost certainly not Compat (I don't think anyone has ever added
>>>>> an upper bound to a Compat dependency). Perhaps loop over Pkg.installed()
>>>>> and display the contents of the REQUIRE file for the specific tags you
>>>>> have
>>>>> currently installed, see who is upper-bounding each other? We do need
>>>>> better tools for debugging this kind of thing to make it easier to figure
>>>>> out what the dependency resolver is doing, which bound constraints are
>>>>> active etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:25:53 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay - I removed GaussianMixtures and now it is complaining about
>>>>>> Compat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: unsatisfiable package requirements detected: no feasible
>>>>>> version could be found for package: Compat
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wrote a script to run through all package REQUIRE files and print
>>>>>> out the Compat line, if any. None of these found anything specifying an
>>>>>> upper-bound.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to find the offending packages. Is there a good way to
>>>>>> go about doing this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ArgParse: Compat 0.7.3
>>>>>> ArrayViews: Compat
>>>>>> AutomotiveDrivingModels: Compat 0.8
>>>>>> AxisAlgorithms: Compat 0.8
>>>>>> BayesNets: Compat
>>>>>> BinDeps: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> Blink: Compat 0.8.6
>>>>>> Blosc: Compat 0.8
>>>>>> BufferedStreams: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> Cairo: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> Calculus: Compat 0.4.0
>>>>>> Codecs: Compat 0.7.20
>>>>>> Colors: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> Compose: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> Conda: Compat 0.8
>>>>>> ConjugatePriors: Compat 0.4.0
>>>>>> Contour: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> DataArrays: Compat 0.8.6
>>>>>> DataFrames: Compat 0.8
>>>>>> Debug: Compat
>>>>>> Discretizers: Compat
>>>>>> Distances: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> Distributions: Compat 0.4.0
>>>>>> Docile: Compat 0.7.1
>>>>>> FastAnonymous: Compat
>>>>>> FileIO: Compat 0.7.19
>>>>>> FixedPointNumbers: Compat 0.7.14
>>>>>> FixedSizeArrays: Compat 0.8.7
>>>>>> Formatting: Compat
>>>>>> ForwardDiff: Compat 0.8.6
>>>>>> Gadfly: Compat 0.8.5
>>>>>> Glob: Compat
>>>>>> Graphs: Compat 0.7.16
>>>>>> Gtk: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> GtkUtilities: Compat 0.7.16
>>>>>> GZip: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> HDF5: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> Hexagons: Compat
>>>>>> Hiccup: Compat 0.8.2
>>>>>> HttpCommon: Compat 0.7.20
>>>>>> HttpParser: Compat 0.7.20
>>>>>> HttpServer: Compat 0.7.16
>>>>>> IJulia: Compat 0.7.20
>>>>>> ImageMagick: Compat 0.7.7
>>>>>> Images: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> ImageView: Compat 0.4.6
>>>>>> IniFile: Compat 0.7.4
>>>>>> Interact: Compat 0.7
>>>>>> Interpolations: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> Ipopt: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> Iterators: Compat
>>>>>> JLD: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> JSON: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> JuMP: Compat 0.8.6
>>>>>> KernelDensity: Compat
>>>>>> LaTeXStrings: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> Lazy: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> LegacyStrings: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> Libz: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> LightXML: Compat 0.8.3
>>>>>> Lint: Compat 0.8.2
>>>>>> Loess: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> MacroTools: Compat
>>>>>> MathProgBase: Compat 0.7.13
>>>>>> MbedTLS: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> MLBase: Compat
>>>>>> MultivariateStats: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> Mustache: Compat 0.7.18
>>>>>> NBInclude: Compat 0.7.9
>>>>>> Nettle: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> NLopt: Compat 0.8
>>>>>> Optim: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> ParserCombinator: Compat 0.7.12
>>>>>> PDMats: Compat
>>>>>> PGFPlots: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> PlotlyJS: Compat 0.7.16
>>>>>> Plots: Compat
>>>>>> PositiveFactorizations: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> ProfileView: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> PyCall: Compat 0.7.1
>>>>>> PyPlot: Compat 0.4
>>>>>> Ratios: Compat
>>>>>> RDatasets: Compat
>>>>>> Reactive: Compat
>>>>>> Reel: Compat
>>>>>> Requests: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> ReverseDiffSparse: Compat 0.8.6
>>>>>> SHA: Compat 0.7.9
>>>>>> Showoff: Compat
>>>>>> SIUnits: Compat
>>>>>> SortingAlgorithms: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> StatsBase: Compat 0.8.4
>>>>>> StatsFuns: Compat 0.7.18
>>>>>> Sundials: Compat
>>>>>> SymPy: Compat 0.4
>>>>>> TexExtensions: Compat
>>>>>> TextWrap: Compat 0.7.15
>>>>>> TikzGraphs: Compat
>>>>>> TikzPictures: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> Tk: Compat 0.4.6
>>>>>> URIParser: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>> VideoIO: Compat 0.8.7
>>>>>> WebSockets: Compat 0.7.16
>>>>>> Winston: Compat 0.4.4
>>>>>> WoodburyMatrices: Compat
>>>>>> Zlib: Compat
>>>>>> ZMQ: Compat 0.8.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:40:37 AM UTC-7, Chris Rackauckas
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe one of its dependencies has a maximum version requirement?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:38:01 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Okay, this is a little weird.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I run the following it looks like the culprit is a dirty package:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> julia> Pkg.checkout("Distributions")
>>>>>>>> INFO: Checking out Distributions master...
>>>>>>>> INFO: Pulling Distributions latest master...
>>>>>>>> WARNING: Distributions is fixed at 0.10.1+ conflicting with
>>>>>>>> requirement for GaussianMixtures: [0.0.0,0.10.0)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The weird thing is that the REQUIRE file for GaussianMixtures does
>>>>>>>> not mention the 0.10.1+
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> julia 0.3
>>>>>>>> Clustering
>>>>>>>> Distributions
>>>>>>>> PDMats
>>>>>>>> Compat
>>>>>>>> JLD
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where does that come from?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:31:44 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Julia Users,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just noticed something a little weird. I am using
>>>>>>>>> Distributions.jl (great package btw) in Julia 0.4.6 on Ubuntu, and it
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> listed in Pkg.status() as a required package:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Distributions 0.8.9
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I checked on METADATA and on the Distributions.jl github - there
>>>>>>>>> is a more recent version. In fact, there are several more recent
>>>>>>>>> versions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I ran Pkg.update(), which updated some things but did not change
>>>>>>>>> Distributions.jl. Am I missing something? Is there some package that
>>>>>>>>> requires Distributions be less-than-current?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>> -Tim
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
