Chris, Thanks for consolidating efforts and setting things up to set up a community for all kinds of differential equations.
I wonder if we should have a DiffEq channel/room on the julia gitter rather than a new gitter? Just a thought. For now, many projects do have their own gitter - like Bio.jl. -viral > On Aug 26, 2016, at 4:41 AM, Chris Rackauckas <[email protected]> wrote: > > This has already been done. As of last night we have JuliaDiffEq where we > have moved Sundials and ODE. DifferentialEquations will follow soon, and I am > talking with the owner of ODEInterface to see if that should go there as well > (and if it should be expanded). > > If you have any ideas, open an issue on the Roadmap repo. We should find out > what the other SDE/PDE packages are and coordinate efforts/APIs. The other > SDE packages are pretty basic, and I don't think it would be useful to deal > with simple things like StochasticEuler. Bridge.jl may be interesting: I know > that it may need to be needed by DifferentialEquations for more easily > implementing stochastic integral equations and a few high weak order methods, > so it would be nice to pull it into the group. The idea would that others > could do similar tasks easier if this is all coordinated together. > > My goal is to have DifferentialEquations.jl wrap all of the solvers here. You > can already use Sundials, ODEInterface, and ODE from DifferentialEquations. > More coordination is likely required to make the PDE packages compatible (and > I don't know of very many, JuliaFEM and HP-FEM?). Probably the toolings for > making FEM meshes and things like that should spawn out to their own package > and become more complete. Of course, others will have their own reason for > having compatible APIs. > > I just setup a unified Gitter. I think we should have the current ODE and > DifferentialEquations Gitters merge to this JuliaDiffEq one so that way it > will be easier to find help. > > On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 3:09:49 PM UTC-7, Christoph Ortner wrote: > A separate organisation would be really welcome especially if it means > coordination of efforts on the development of DE-related work. -viral
