On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:21 AM Kevin Squire <kevin.squ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Generally it's not a different syntax, and the error generated here is > probably a consequence of recent parser changes to handle dot-operator > overloading (and should probably be reported as a bug, and possibly fixed.) > You mean fused broadcasting syntax, right? Or is full dot-operator overloading on the table again? Cheers, Bart
