Nice! Thanks for the Info
On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 11:53:25 AM UTC+2, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > > Le vendredi 01 juillet 2016 à 16:11 -0700, baillot maxime a écrit : > > @Tim Holy : Thank you for the web page. I didn't know it. Now I > > understand a lot of thing :) > > > > @Kristoffer and Patrick: I just read about that in the link that Tim > > gave me. I did change the code and the time just past from 0.348052 > > seconds to 0.037768 seconds. > > > > Thanks to you all. Now I understand a lot of things and why it was > > slower than matlab. > > > > So now I understand why a lot of people was speaking > > about Devectorizing matrix calculus. But I think it's sad, because if > > I want to do this I will use C or C++ . Not a matrixial language > > like Julia or Matlab. > Note that work is going on to allow vectorized syntax to be (almost) as > efficient as devectorized loops. See > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/16285 > > > Regards > > > Anyway! So if I'm not mistaking... It's better for me to create a > > "mul()" function than use the ".*" ? >
