Le jeudi 26 mai 2016 à 09:03 -0400, Stefan Karpinski a écrit :
> Perhaps these should be called Vector and Array? As in Vector(f(x)
> for x in A) and Array(f(x) for x in A).
Cf. https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/16029
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Jeffrey Sarnoff
> <jeffrey.sarn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I hope Julia is not ready to drop the immediacy of clarity when it
> > is new-found and current use adjacent (e.g. "shape-preserving
> > f(g(x) for x in A)").
> > It is reasonable that `collect` become this better version of its
> > prior self; and, if desired, a vector-only version would have a new
> > name or way of indication.
> > `collectvec( __ )` might do `reshape( (__), prod(size(__)) )`
> >
> >
> >
> > > Yes, so far this is intended. We want a shape-preserving
> > > `collect` for
> > > implementing comprehensions, for example `collect(2x for x in
> > > A)`.
> > > However a case could be made that `collect` should continue to
> > > return
> > > only vectors, and the shape-preserving version should have a new
> > > name.
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:41 PM, <paul.so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure if this is the right place to post questions
> > > about version
> > > > 0.5.0-, but I'll give it a try anyhow.
> > > >
> > > > In 0.4.5, collect([1 2]) gives Array{Int64,1}, like a column
> > > vector.
> > > >
> > > > In 0.5.0_ (as of 25 May, Win64), collect([1 2]) gives
> > > Array{Int64,2}, like a
> > > > row vector.
> > > >
> > > > Is this intended? (...just struggling to prepare for the next
> > > release)
> > > >
> > > > /Paul S
> > >
