In terms of scientific reproducibility, I do not think that saving a click-and-run package is necessarily the best way to further that. What about unstated assumptions in your code, or (shiver) bugs? IMHO, submitting human-readable (i.e. annotated) source code is a stronger way to ensure reproducibility (and what is just as important, transparency). I guess it should be simple just to .zip the source code of the Julia packages you depend on (and their dependencies) from your local library folder.
Den torsdag den 11. februar 2016 kl. 13.06.11 UTC+1 skrev Lyndon White: > > I just realized that not only am I dependent on Julia packages. > but via PyCall, I am also dependent on python packages. > How utterly terrifying packaging this will be. > > I suspect I will end up failing to meet the goal of a package anyone can > just click and run. > But I can at least release all the code in a nice view-able form. > >
