In the Matmul benchmark, "Julia Native" ranks 1st. 
What is Julia Native?


On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 7:02:51 AM UTC+1, Nitin Arora wrote:
>
> Check out this thread. There seems to be discussion on this matter 
> already. Looks like the code used for these benchmarks was not well 
> optimized for Julia and looks they are including Julia startup time and JIT 
> compilation.
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/julia-users/4AgBccftrps/discussion
>
> and 
>
> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/14808#event-527206420
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 8:07:54 PM UTC-8, George wrote:
>>
>> I was surprised to se the results on the following benchmarks:
>> https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks
>>
>> Some benchmarks of different languages 
>> <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks#brainfuck>Brainfuck
>>
>> Brainfuck <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks/tree/master/brainfuck>
>> <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks#benchb>bench.b
>> LanguageTime,sMemory, Mb
>> Nim Clang 3.21 0.7
>> Felix 4.07 1.3
>> Nim Gcc 4.52 0.6
>> Java 4.94 147.6
>> C++ 5.08 1.1
>> Rust 5.46 4.9
>> Scala 5.90 116.3
>> D 6.57 1.0
>> D Ldc 6.61 0.9
>> Crystal 6.97 1.3
>> Go 7.29 1.3
>> Javascript Node 8.74 15.0
>> D Gdc 8.87 1.0
>> Julia 9.25 59.0
>> Javascript V8 9.41 8.1
>> Go Gcc 13.60 10.0
>> Python Pypy 13.94 55.4
>> Javascript Jx 17.14 11.0
>> C# Mono 18.08 15.4
>> OOC 48.86 1.3
>> Ruby JRuby 87.05 124.1
>> Ruby Topaz 112.91 36.0
>> Ruby JRuby9K 160.15 297.2
>> Ruby 226.86 8.0
>> Tcl 262.20 2.7
>> Python 452.44 4.9
>> Ruby Rbx 472.08 45.0
>> Python3 480.78 5.5 <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks#mandelb>mandel.b
>>
>> Mandel in Brainfuck 
>> <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks/blob/master/brainfuck/mandel.b>
>> LanguageTime,sMemory, Mb
>> Nim Clang 28.96 1.0
>> Felix 40.06 3.7
>> D Ldc 43.30 0.9
>> D 45.29 1.2
>> Rust 46.34 4.9
>> Crystal 48.62 1.3
>> Nim Gcc 50.45 0.9
>> Go 52.56 7.6
>> Java 55.14 69.9
>> Cpp 56.63 1.1
>> Scala 64.37 126.4
>> D Gdc 70.12 1.5
>> Go Gcc 85.67 10.7
>> Javascript Node 92.65 15.8
>> Julia 94.33 56.9
>> ...
>
>

Reply via email to