Thanks, yes, but I had expected that in the second command it would give me an Int64 Array, similar as in the 1st command I get automatically an Int64 scalar. But to be fair, like this it is already much better than Matlab:
>> int32(5370)*86400000 ans = 2147483647 >> [int32(5370)]*86400000 ans = 2147483647 /Stephan
