It's also a little unclear to me what this method is useful for. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, this is a bug in that pop! method. I'm working on a fix. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I want to check if a key is in a set, and pop! it if it is the case. >> >> >> 1. In order to do that, I can rely on a try / catch statement (i.e. try >> pop!(x, key)) or a default key (i.e. pop!(x, key, nothing)). Is one >> preferable to the other in term of speed? >> >> 2.. pop!(x, key, nothing) returns nothing even if key is in x. Is this >> expected? >> >> >> nothing == pop!(Set(1:2), 2, nothing) >> >> true >> >> >> >
