On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 8:05:19 PM UTC-4, Art Kuo wrote: > > I've coded up a simple replacement to the show() function for ranges. The > idea is to give the user information more likely to be what they are > wondering. Here are some examples of its output: >
It looks great to me; please consider submitting a pull request. Any thoughts on this arrangement? The output differs from collect() in that > I've arranged elements in a compact row. Also I've assumed that it's > sufficient to print out only the first three elements, and the last two, > because the user should be able to figure it out from there. A possible > point of confusion is "7-element" which isn't actually true of the Range > object. Would it be better to output "7-length" or something else? > "7-element" is nice because it mirrors the output for Array objects. I don't see the problem.
