Could you please file an issue?
-viral
On Saturday, July 11, 2015 at 12:28:52 AM UTC+5:30, Huda Nassar wrote:
>
> *julia> **A = sprand(5,5,2/5)*
>
> *5x5 sparse matrix with 9 Float64 entries:*
>
> * [3, 1] = 0.640396*
>
> * [3, 2] = 0.873544*
>
> * [3, 3] = 0.278582*
>
> * [4, 3] = 0.751313*
>
> * [1, 4] = 0.644883*
>
> * [2, 4] = 0.0778264*
>
> * [3, 4] = 0.848185*
>
> * [2, 5] = 0.0856352*
>
> * [3, 5] = 0.553206*
>
> *julia> **B = sprand(5,5,2/5)*
>
> *5x5 sparse matrix with 9 Float64 entries:*
>
> * [2, 1] = 0.404673*
>
> * [3, 1] = 0.736787*
>
> * [4, 1] = 0.953803*
>
> * [1, 2] = 0.0951856*
>
> * [4, 2] = 0.519675*
>
> * [1, 3] = 0.0135403*
>
> * [4, 3] = 0.303399*
>
> * [1, 5] = 0.702557*
>
> * [4, 5] = 0.596537*
>
> *julia> **C = max(A,B)*
>
> *5x5 Array{Float64,2}:*
>
> * 0.0 0.0951856 0.0135403 0.644883 0.702557*
>
> * 0.404673 0.0 0.0 0.0778264 0.0856352*
>
> * 0.736787 0.873544 0.278582 0.848185 0.553206*
>
> * 0.953803 0.519675 0.751313 0.0 0.596537*
>
> * 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *
>
> Isn't this an undesired behavior of max() when called on 2 sparse
> matrices? Shouldn't the output be sparse as well?
>
