Definitely not a requirement, just convention. If there are other proposals out there I'm happy to entertain them.
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 1:51:07 PM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Does atom require you to name the repository language-julia? I'm generally > in favor of your plan here but maybe a more specific repo name would be > clearer, if that's possible? > > > On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 10:33:45 AM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: >> >> Right now the atom package for adding syntax highlighting for Julia is >> https://github.com/tpoisot/language-julia >> >> Based on issues like this one ( >> https://github.com/tpoisot/language-julia/issues/8) it seems like the >> grammar.cson is incorrect. >> >> I did a fresh restart of the grammar based on the official text mate >> bundle https://github.com/JuliaLang/Julia.tmbundle and all these issues >> seem to be resolved. It is a relief to not have syntax highlighting treat >> everything as a string mid-file! >> >> I've also added everything in Base.REPLCompletions.latex_symbols >> and Base.REPLCompletions.emoji_symbols as snippets. >> >> I'm writing here to propose two things: >> >> 1. Contact the maintainer of the current language-julia atom package, >> merge in the new features he has added, and begin using the new one >> generated from the tmBundle as the official Julia support for atom >> 2. To make it seem more "official" I would like house the repository >> under the JuliaLang github organization in a repo JuliaLang/language-julia. >> >> What do people think about this idea? >> >
