I'm not aware of any non-DWARF efforts aside from Debug.jl ... Curious to know what you are proposing, though. I think you could actually get some good mileage out of instrumenting `jl_apply` (this is basically how I use gdb most of the time, except I isolate the function call I want to trap first because `jl_apply` is very hot)
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Michael Turok <michael.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, but I'm interested in an debugger that would work without a custom > compilation of LLVM, and would work with a stock release of julia 0.3*. > > On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 11:11:09 AM UTC-4, Isaiah wrote: > >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-dev/gcZ5dZJni5o/VYaLkCd756cJ >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Michael Turok <michae...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Is there anyone currently focusing on building an AST-level debugger >>> that can navigate stack frames and not require modifying code to insert >>> instrumentation stubs, etc? >>> >>> While the LLVM JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from December >>> 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-lying fruit out >>> there..... >>> >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/debugger/julia-users/zEqWxn7HDVo/ZTRZh4ziR9kJ >>> >> >>
