Thanks, Pablo & Matt! I was also looking at other operators, such as &,
which apparently used to have a unary form, and still has a unary *method*,
but gets an error if you try to do something like &55...
On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 6:53:03 PM UTC+2, Matt Bauman wrote:
>
> julia> methods(\, (Any,))
> 0-element Array{Any,1}
>
> julia> methods(+, (Any,))
> 5-element Array{Any,1}:
> +(x::Bool) at bool.jl:33
> +(x::Number) at operators.jl:73
> +{T<:Number}(x::AbstractArray{T<:Number,N}) at abstractarray.jl:421
> +(x::Base.Dates.Instant) at dates/arithmetic.jl:4
> +(x::Base.Dates.TimeType) at dates/arithmetic.jl:8
>
> (That is, there are none. `methods` currently supports types being passed
> both in a tuple and as a Tuple type: `methods(+, Tuple{Any,})`)
>
> On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 12:41:15 PM UTC-4, Scott Jones wrote:
>>
>> What is the easiest way of finding out what the unary methods of an
>> operator are (if any)?
>> I did methods(\), and got 40 methods, but I really only want to see if
>> there are any unary forms...
>> Thanks, Scott
>>
>
