... and then we can also allow functions calls with white-space syntax? y = sqrt x
-erik > On Jan 24, 2015, at 15:48 , Ivar Nesje <[email protected]> wrote: > > See also #7232 where the suggestion is to disallow space before the > parenthesis in function definitions and function calls. That will at least > make julia code more consistent in that functions and macros work more > similarly. > > lørdag 24. januar 2015 17.00.17 UTC+1 skrev Erik Schnetter følgende: > On Jan 24, 2015, at 2:53 , Ivar Nesje <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > See also > > > > @test(1, 2, 3, 4) > > ... and compare this to > > @test (1, 2, 3, 4) > > (with white space before the parenthesis). > > That's a part of Julia's syntax that I don't like. On the other hand, the > ability to pass whitespace-separated arguments to macros instead of only > comma-separated values is a very powerful feature, as it allows passing in > statements without having to wrap them in parentheses. > > -erik > > -- > Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> > http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/ > > My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting > and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from https://sks-keyservers.net. > -- Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/ My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from https://sks-keyservers.net.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
