hey! yeah no worries! when I overcame my impatience (which led me to abort the download after 2 seconds because of the "wrong" name), I found out that the package had the correct content.
cheers On 19 August 2014 16:54, Elliot Saba <[email protected]> wrote: > Whoops, sorry about that Florian! There must be a small error in the .dmg > filename, but if you open it, you see there is a Julia-0.3.0-rc4.app inside. > -E > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Ivar Nesje <[email protected]> wrote: > >> #7846 <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/7846> >> >> and >> >> Base.runtests >> <http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/stdlib/test/?highlight=runtests#Base.runtests> >> >> kl. 14:52:00 UTC+2 tirsdag 19. august 2014 skrev Johan Sigfrids følgende: >> >>> Is there a way for a user that downloads the RC4 binary to run the test >>> suit? That would be a good way to help uncover those pesky bugs. >>> >>> On Monday, August 18, 2014 6:36:47 PM UTC+3, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >>>> >>>> +1,000,000 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:25 AM, John Myles White < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> One of the best things you can do for the Julia community is to start >>>>> using the release candidates of 0.3. Everyone will be better off if bugs >>>>> are found now rather than when 0.3 is released. You can help make 0.3 a >>>>> better release by installing one of the latest binaries and testing it >>>>> out. >>>>> >>>>> This is especially important for projects like DataFrames, which have >>>>> fewer developer hours to spare on issues related to 0.2. >>>>> >>>>> — John >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >
