Yes, I think it's totally fine until it can be merged into another package. The capitalization thing is a convention, not a rule. It's almost good to have at least one package around that violates the convention so that we can't assume that all packages start with an uppercase letter.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, John Myles White <[email protected] > wrote: > Good point. I guess we’ll have to watch until we put kNN.jl inside of > another package before we can get rid of it. > > — John > > On Aug 18, 2014, at 7:18 AM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This is not a good idea – it will cause endless problems on > case-insensitive file systems like HFS+ on Macs. > > On Aug 18, 2014, at 10:08 AM, John Myles White <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I can probably register KNN.jl and deprecate kNN.jl. > > — John > > On Aug 18, 2014, at 5:45 AM, Iain Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, it is the Julia convention. > There is only one (registered) exception, which is prehistoric in Julia > terms (kNN.jl) > > On Monday, August 18, 2014 8:32:40 AM UTC-4, TR NS wrote: >> >> Is the capitalization of package names a standard convention we can count >> on? >> > > >
