Thanks Patrick.

Does this mean that there is no way to make things private? I thought that 
only explicitly exported symbols where accessible. 

Anyway then, what is the common approach in Julia to mark things as 
private? Python use single and double leading underscores, but haven't seen 
too much _s in JUlia code.

Davide

On Monday, June 9, 2014 10:32:23 PM UTC+1, Patrick O'Leary wrote:
>
> Use the "using" keyword instead of the "import" keyword, in conjunction 
> with your (correct) intuition about "export".
>
> module MyModule
>
> include("file.jl")
> export foo
>
> end
>
> ...
>
> using MyModule
> foo()
> MyModule.bar()
>
> On Monday, June 9, 2014 4:21:16 PM UTC-5, Davide Lasagna wrote:
>>
>> Hi all, 
>>
>> I have a question about modules and I am probably missing something.
>>
>> Say that in file.jl I define functions foo and bar. I then create a file 
>> MyModule.jl where I include file.jl as:
>>
>> module MyModule
>>
>> include("file.jl")
>>
>> end
>>
>>
>> At this point, in the REPL, doing import MyModule will give me access to 
>> both foo and bar. Say, however, that I only want foo to be visible from 
>> the outside, while I want bar to remain private, because it is some 
>> accessory function used in foo.
>>
>> What is the preferred way to achieve this? I thought that after 
>> include("file.jl") 
>> I should have added an export foo to make it accessible to the outside, 
>> but the include function is making everything in file.jl visible.
>>
>> Thanks, 
>>
>> Davide
>>
>>

Reply via email to