Indeed. And just landing today is support for btrfs as well. So there'll be a choice of: lxd (the default, directory based) lxd-zfs lxd-btrfs
On 14/07/17 13:46, Menno Smits wrote: > Nice work Andrew! These changes make Juju's storage support much more > powerful. > > > > On 13 July 2017 at 20:56, Andrew Wilkins <andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I've just published https://awilkins.id.au/post/juju-2.3-storage/, which >> highlights some of the new bits added around storage that's coming to Juju >> 2.3. I particularly wanted to highlight that a new LXD storage provider has >> just landed on develop today. It should be available in the edge snap soon. >> >> The LXD storage provider will enable you to attach LXD storage volumes to >> your containers, and use that for a charm's storage requirements. e.g. >> >> $ juju deploy postgresql --storage pgdata=1G,lxd-zfs >> >> This will create a LXD storage pool backed by a ZFS pool, create a 1GiB >> ZFS volume and attach that to the container. >> >> I'd appreciate feedback on the new provider, and the attach/detach changes >> described in the blog post, preferably before 2.3 comes around. In >> particular, UX warts or functionality that you're missing or anything you >> find broken-by-design -- stuff that can't easily be fixed after we release. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Cheers, >> Andrew >> >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ >> mailman/listinfo/juju >> >> > > > -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
