On 26 April 2017 at 02:37, Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> wrote:
> > Another aspect of that idea is that we should formalize the notion that > handlers react to *changes* in flags, rather than the flags themselves, and > the "changed" state of flags should not be tied to hook invocations and > persist until an actual, meaningful change happens to that flag. This > would remove the surprising current behavior that handlers are reinvoked > repeatedly as long as their conditions match, simply because a hook > triggered even if it didn't represent anything meaningful to the particular > handler. > This sounds like a great improvement. Thanks for the update. - Menno
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
