Hi James What's the use case your using them for? Elastic IPs in aws are a very limited commodity you get like 5 per region per account by default. IMO it's generally not a recommended practice to depend on them as effectively they represent public endpoints mapping to a single instance in aws. Using elb or r53 is typically better for scale out. Note eips are distinct from Enis re multiple private addresses and nats re shadow ips.
Ps. My wishlist for juju and aws would be to support non static credentials per best practices. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 5:18 AM Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> wrote: On 05/11/16 17:42, James Beedy wrote: > How does everyone few about extending the AWS provider to support elastic ips? > > Capability to attach eips using juju would alleviate one more manual step I have to preform from the aws console every time I spin up an instance. > > I have created a feature request here -> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1639459 Yes, this would be excellent. Conceptually at least, in Juju, we have a place for "the internet" as a dedicated Network (networks are collections of spaces) and for "shadow-ip addresses" (which are addresses on one network that tunnel to addresses on another network). These concepts give us elastic IPs very naturally, but they also are important for cross-model relations in the private cloud, and I think we should map out and implement this carefully as one coherent hybrid cloud operations story. Mark -- Juju-dev mailing list juju-...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
