I think we've seen in many environments that clock skew causes sutble problems, so having "ntp everywhere" is a very good practice. That in turn suggests its really worthwhile to have high quality and very robust charms, that handle everything from initial time correction to long term stability of the system clocks in a cluster. So +2 from me and thank you!
Mark On 05/09/16 02:45, Paul Gear wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm thinking about doing some work to modernise and improve the ntp and > ntpmaster charms, and would first like to know how many people use them, > and how. > > If you use these charms (or if you might use them in the future), I'd > appreciate your input on the following short questionnaire: > https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfGCYyA1xPCMQ3DWKNVbHjN-DTW48uIlXurzZMyGt1i3FhBcw/viewform > > The motivation for these questions is to find out how important the NTP > charms are in our ecosystem, and how useful it would be for them to be > more self-configuring, based on the constraints of the environment. > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
