I just finished building a docker image for anyone who wants to test
juju 1.23-beta2 in a clean environment. By default, it'll setup a new,
persistent environment:
docker run -ti adamisrael/juju-1.23 -v
$HOME/.juju-1.23:/home/ubuntu/.juju
I intend to maintain images for each released version of juju, as well
as a nightly build of trunk.
Issues, suggestions, and pull requests welcome:
https://github.com/AdamIsrael/dockerfiles/tree/master/juju/1.23
On 2015-03-27 10:16 AM, Charles Butler wrote:
> Using the docker box is a complete isolation from your local system.
> We're building docker images to scratch some itches:
>
> - Run latest juju in full isolation so we can test the new features as
> they land
> - Isolate dependencies during charm reviews. (00-setup as sudo on your
> system leaves WHAT behind exactly?)
> - A portable method to try things, and get other users started
> - Doing something interesting? commit a layer and share it!
>
> There's more implications here than I have listed - but it's a good
> start to see why we are exploring the distribution of dockerfiles for
> juju client usage.
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Charles Butler <charles.but...@canonical.com
> <mailto:charles.but...@canonical.com>> - Juju Charmer
> Come see the future of datacenter orchestration: http://jujucharms.com
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Nate Finch <nate.fi...@canonical.com
> <mailto:nate.fi...@canonical.com>> wrote:
>
> What does this do that just using the juju binary on your local
> system doesn't do?
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jorge O. Castro
> <jo...@ubuntu.com <mailto:jo...@ubuntu.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> First, if you haven't seen this yet, this is a docker
> container that
> let's you just try Juju, with the limitation that you can't do the
> local provider.
>
> - https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/whitmo/jujubox/
> - https://github.com/whitmo/jujubox
>
> And here's the new bits, Cory Johns has been working on making
> a juju
> docker container that is more useful for charm developers and
> testers
> (so it's a bit larger than the jujubox)
>
> - https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/johnsca/charmbox/
> - https://github.com/juju-solutions/charmbox
>
> Again the limitation is you can't use the local provider,
> however if
> you're testing on public clouds then you should see dramatic
> workflow
> speed vs. using the vagrant boxes.
>
> PRs and feedback all welcome!
>
> --
> Jorge Castro
> Canonical Ltd.
> http://juju.ubuntu.com/ - Automate your Cloud Infrastructure
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Juju@lists.ubuntu.com>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Juju@lists.ubuntu.com>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
>
>
>
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
