Hi Charles, Thanks for the explanation, sounds reasonable. Makes sense now.
-Dean On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Charles Butler < [email protected]> wrote: > Dean, > > The post to the list is 2 fold. One is it provides a clear and concise > path of what we have worked on for the week during our Review duty. It also > increases exposure as to what the Charmers have been addressed and provides > a quick/easy method to respond and participate in the process. As James > Troup already commented on, they are quite useful to our users that are > primarily focused in github but want to know what was updated over the > week. And as we know Juju Charm development is primarly focused in > Launchpad. > > The secondary side to this is it really does shine a light on the great > work of the community we are building, and prompts for more communication > as to whats happening with the Review Queue. Prior to this notification, > our users were constantly lost on the review process, what has been looked > at vs what hasn''t. And the list looked long - stale - and quite > unattractive to new users as they didn't fully understand how we were > interfacing with the RevQ. > > Sorry you feel that this is overkill, however the notices are indeed > easily filtered out of your mailing list feed with some filters. > > Hope this helps and all the best, > > Charles > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Dean Henrichsmeyer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Since charm reviews are documented in Launchpad, can someone explain to >> me the necessity of email summaries to the list? Everyone is so busy I'm >> having a hard time understanding the need for the redundancy and the extra >> noise it brings to the list. >> >> Thanks, >> Dean >> >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >> >> >
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
