Thanks!! now we are really using the charm in the notebooks of the devs \o/
David, the Drupal charm was installing the xdebug as default, and in the host was only the php-cli and php-apc so thats why. Abs, Sebas. 2014-07-09 5:28 GMT-03:00 David Cheney <[email protected]>: > Excellent news. I'm glad you got to the bottom of it. > > Do you know why php5-xdebug was installed the lxc container, but not > your vagrant vm ? > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Sebastian <[email protected]> wrote: > > ha!! gotcha!! finally I know why, the php5-xdebug was installed and > enabled > > by default, didn't know was such a big impact of performance. > > > > So this is going to the charm's configuration, so can be an option. > > > > Happy Sebas now. > > > > 2014-07-09 2:40 GMT-03:00 Sebastian <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hey there! > >> > >> After I did the Drupal charm, part of my plan was that the developers > now > >> can use the juju-local with lxc containers to deploy every project > >> environment using bundles. > >> > >> But! we notice a BIG difference of performance in the containers, so we > >> run a PHP benchmarking script: > >> > >> Host (vbox): > >> vagrant@vagrant-ubuntu-trusty-64:~$ php bench.php > >> -------------------------------------- > >> test_math : 3.190 sec. > >> test_stringmanipulation : 2.859 sec. > >> test_loops : 1.702 sec. > >> test_ifelse : 1.319 sec. > >> -------------------------------------- > >> Total time: : 9.07 sec. > >> > >> Lxc container (into the vbox): > >> ubuntu@vagrant-local-machine-4:~$ php bench.php > >> -------------------------------------- > >> test_math : 37.062 sec. > >> test_stringmanipulation : 30.826 sec. > >> test_loops : 5.749 sec. > >> test_ifelse : 6.149 sec. > >> -------------------------------------- > >> Total time: : 79.786 sec. > >> > >> > >> As you can see, the containers created by Juju took 70 seconds more than > >> the host. > >> The versions of the php where the same, and this was also tested in bare > >> metal, to ensure that the virtualization of the host wasn't the issue. > >> > >> We understand how this impact the implementation of Juju as a complete > >> solution for devs and ops. Is not everyone that can buy a super > computer to > >> virtualize each charm, in his local notebook. So that's why I'm here, > >> telling our story. > >> > >> Maybe this is an issue that belongs to the LXC group, but I thought > >> interesting to share this. > >> > >> If someone can do the same benchmarkings and share the results, or any > >> help to make things better, please!! it's more than welcome. > >> > >> Cheers!, > >> Sebas. > >> > > > > > > -- > > Juju mailing list > > [email protected] > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > > >
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
