On 24 October 2016 at 22:22, Menno Smits <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25 October 2016 at 10:17, Horacio Duran <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Shouldn't we leave it for historic purposes?
>>
>
> Will it really get used? My bet is that the project's commit history will be
> enough.

I think that review history is crucial for context on historic
code decisions - I often look into a review to see why a
particular piece of code is the way it is (including old
Juju codereview reviews).

It would be unfortunate to lose them in my view.

  cheers,
    rog.

-- 
Juju-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Reply via email to