On 27 September 2016 at 18:14, John Meinel <j...@arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
> At one point we discussed that "kill-controller" should always be strictly > "--with-fire" while "destroy-controller" would do the safe cleanup. That > allows you to have a "make sure it is all dead" but not give people a false > sense of security that they can just run it always. --with-fire is going to > be inherently risky once you have multiple credentials. Because at that > point, your current credentials cannot list all of the possible instances > that are running everywhere. > I don't think having subtle differences like that is good for end users. I know I'm often entering several commands trying to guess which kill/destroy/remove/delete verb I should be using for this product this week. You will never be consistent with every other product, so there will always be confusion. -- Stuart Bishop <stuart.bis...@canonical.com>
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
