On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Ian Booth <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I personally encourage us to use heterogeneous versions of go as much as >>> we can. Because we should be compatible as much as possible. But it does >>> look like our dependencies are going to force our hand. >> >> Agreed. I think it's healthy for Juju's devs to be using a range of Go >> versions (within reason). It helps to ensure we not relying on version >> specific behaviour. > > +1. And I like life on the edge, so 1.6 for me :-D
FWIW I am using 1.6 and haven't experienced any problems. I have seen the new vet and runtime show problems up that weren't previously detected. Not writing backwards incompatible code will be "fun", but I doubt I will try and use %X over %x in a format string. James -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
