Rey Bango: Ok, i understand you, i not want to resolve that, IS JUST FOR LEARNING, we need to observe and study that in group. Now, answer me a question: Do you know exactly diference features in animation frameworks in both?
Is hard to me study code by code, its hard mathematics. You is the developer in framework. In past jquery uses moo.fx for animation is true? I see in jquery code the comment of john resign: 'This is a modification of moo.fx'. Ok. its a modification, but the logic I supose is same. What do you say? And Now, i don't know how is the jquery animation code. Help me if is possible? IS JUST FOR LEARNING. On Jan 6, 6:58 pm, Rey Bango <r...@reybango.com> wrote: > They both seem to run equally smooth to me. I saw occasional jumpiness > on both demos. > > Seriously, you've been on this specific topic since early November and > just doing a Google search shows that you've asked a ton of people the > same question. If you feel that jQuery's effects could be smoother, I > urge you to help out the project by investing the time to tackle > whatever concerns you have. Doing that will not only ease your > concerns but helps out everyone in the community. > > Rey... > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Acaz Souza <acazso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > MooTools:http://www.jsfiddle.net/4vnya/ > > jQuery:http://www.jsfiddle.net/eFbwJ/36/ > > (Compare the code, the effects. You decide.) > > > Why mootools is more smooth than jquery?
