The value you return should be simply just "true" or "false". No HTML
or other stuff.

Not:

<html>
  <head><title>Remote Email Validator</title></head>
  <body>
true
  </body>
</html>

or:

<html>
  <head><title>Remote Email Validator</title></head>
  <body>
false
  </body>
</html>

Just:

true

or:

false

Notice the difference? :)

On Nov 2, 1:10 pm, Felix <gre1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a static html page for testing and the remote field is wired
> correctly with email as the following
>  rules: {
>                 FirstNameEdit: { required: true },
>                 LastNameEdit: { required: true },
>                 EmailEdit: { required: true, email: true, remote:
> "emails.jsp" } ,
>                 EnrollYear: {required: true}
>                 },
>             messages: {
>                 FirstNameEdit: {required:"First name is required"},
>                 LastNameEdit: {required:"Last name is required"},
>                 EmailEdit: {required:"Valid email address is
> required", remote:"Incorrect email address"},
>                 EnrollYear: {required:"Choose one from the list"}
>                 }
>
> The emails.jsp page is very simple page as the following
>
> <%@ page language="java" contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
>     pageEncoding="UTF-8"%>
>
> <html>
>   <head><title>Remote Email Validator</title></head>
>   <body>
>   <%      //get an instance of the email validator
>       if (request.getParameter("email") == null) {
>                   out.print("false");
>               } else {
>                  String email =request.getParameter("email");
>                  email = email.trim();
>                  if(email.equals("a...@email.com")){
>                         out.print("false");
>                 }
>                 else{
>                         out.print("true");
>                 }
>
>               }
>   %>
>   </body>
> </html>
>
> I would like to know what did I do wrong such that email is not using
> the result from emails.jsp when making a remote validation.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Felix

Reply via email to