> > Often the best solution is to simply avoid troublesome features.
I think this article explains the concept well http://www.alistapart.com/articles/testdriven as simple as possible but not simpler 30,000 registered at TNL.net that would be an awful lot to check; which is why checking is the user supports the correct implementation of box model or cssFloat depending on what your using is much smarter - S 2009/9/21 RobG <robg...@gmail.com> > > > > On Sep 18, 1:32 am, ldexterldesign <m...@ldexterldesign.co.uk> wrote: > [...] > > This still leaves the issue of targeting browsers with JS/jQuery. > > You still seem to be missing the message: trying to compensate for > browser quirks by detecting specific browsers is a flawed strategy. > Browser detection is usually based on the user agent string, of which > there are over 30,000 registered at TNL.net. > > > > A > > friend of mine just recommend:http://www.quirksmode.org/js/detect.html > > Don't use it. Don't even consider detecting specific browsers for > javascript quirks. For HTML or CSS hacks, go to relevant forums. Often > the best solution is to simply avoid troublesome features. > > > -- > Rob
