"Am I missing something here????"
Yes, you are assuming that the results will come back in the order
called, which totally is not the case.... the success function simply
says "when you return from this async call, run this", there is
nothing in the logic about "order"
There is an older plugin that could be used "Ajax Queue" (http://
www.google.com/search?q=ajax+queue), or you can adjust your code
accordingly
On Aug 10, 8:34 am, sak <saks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I am a newbie to using jquery and have been exploring it developing a
> new app. At the moment I have a number of AJAX calls to the server
> which I have been queueing in an array and using a single $.ajax call
> to handle all of them. However I know about the browser limitations of
> two calls per page (at the same time and want to implement this to
> speed up page updating). To test concurrent ajax requests I have setup
> various asp pages to with delays 1sec, 5sec, 10sec etc etc. and a test
> html file with the follwing javascript
>
> $('#btn1', '#divTest').click(function(event){
> $.ajax({
> url: 'include/asp/test/one_secs.asp',
> type: 'GET',
> cache: 'false',
> processData: false,
> success: function(data, txtStatus) {
> alert(data);
> },
> });});
>
> $('#btn10', '#divTest').click(function(event){
> $.ajax({
> url: 'include/asp/test/ten_secs.asp',
> type: 'GET',
> cache: 'false',
> processData: false,
> success: function(data, txtStatus) {
> alert(data);
> },
> });
>
> });
>
> so now when I click on btn1 it returns the call after 1sec as it
> should, and the 10sec button after 10 seconds all good. When I click
> the 10 seconds first, quickly followed by the 1second button I expect
> the 1second to return first followed by the 10 second...
>
> This doesn't happen it still processes the 10second first and returns
> the 1second after the 10second is finished.
>
> Am I missing something here???? I have seen something in other forums
> that suggest it may be server related (server queuing the
> requests) ?????
>
> Also I apologise if this has been discussed before (I have been
> searching all morning for a solution), buthaven't found anything......
>
> any help would be brilliant
