Good point Pierre!
Well noted. TKS.
Any others possible differences?
MaurĂ­cio
  -----Mensagem Original----- 
  De: Pierre Bellan 
  Para: jquery-en@googlegroups.com 
  Enviada em: quarta-feira, 10 de junho de 2009 13:25
  Assunto: [jQuery] Re: :eq versus eq()


  With the traversing method, you can match a set of elements then select, for 
example, the third one


  $('.myclass,#myid').eq(2)


  I didn't use the traversing method but i think that is one of possible usage


  Pierre


  2009/6/10 Maujor <css.mau...@gmail.com>



    According jQuery documentation  [1][2]
    :eq returns Array <Element> and eq() returns one jQuery object.
    What does means "Array <Element>"? It is a single element?
    By the other hand eq() => "Reduce the set of matched elements to a single
    element."
    So, both returns a single element and it seems to me that there isn't any
    difference between :eq and eq().
    Is one faster than the other?
    Why are there two sintaxes to achieve the same task? Or am I missing
    sometghing?

    [1] http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors
    [2] http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing

    -----
    MaurĂ­cio Samy Silva
    --
    View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/%3Aeq-versus-eq%28%29-tp23962849s27240p23962849.html
    Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Reply via email to