Take a look at http://jquery.bassistance.de/validate/demo/marketo/mktSignup.js
The billingRequired method is what you should look for. Jörn On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Thomas Allen <thomasmal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > And I'm not going out of my way to change the subject...I'm not sure > what's going on there. > > Thomas > > On Apr 28, 2:40 pm, Thomas Allen <thomasmal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > a custom method is used for the fields inside the Billing Address group >> >> What does this method do (or, better, what's it called so I can search >> the source)? >> >> Thanks, >> Thomas >> >> On Apr 28, 2:16 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <joern.zaeffe...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > One alternative approach can be found >> > here:http://jquery.bassistance.de/validate/demo/marketo/step2.htm >> >> > Instead of adding and removing classes, a custom method is used for >> > the fields inside the Billing Address group. Whatever works for you... >> >> > Jörn >> >> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Thomas Allen <thomasmal...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> > > I have a form with a flexible number of field sets on my form. I think >> > > it'll be easier to understand if you just fiddle around a bit here: >> >> > >http://content.constructioninst.org/corporate_renewal.html >> >> > > I want to make a handful of fields be required in each field set, but >> > > only fields in visible field sets should be required. I have a >> > > mechanism to check this; the toggler I created updates a hidden field >> > > when a set is added or removed (there is one such counter field for >> > > each expandable section, "Individual Members" and "Younger Members." >> >> > > Should I simply add the "required" class to the appropriate inputs in >> > > a field set when it's exposed, and remove them when hidden? Seems a >> > > little hackish, but maybe that's the best way. >> >> > > Also, if anybody has pointers for the script that's there, that would >> > > be nice :^) One thing that I still have to do is make the field set >> > > counts visible to the user, but that's more of a design question right >> > > now. >> >> > > Thanks, >> > > Thomas >> >>
