This is good to here. I just implemented tablesort, at which there will be up to 1000 rows. Glad to know that 400 sorts very quickly.
On Apr 9, 5:19 pm, csi95 <bmomal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, my bad here. > > Thanks to the one-on-one help of one of the great members here, I was able > to find the problem. > > It wasn't the software, it was the hardware. > > There was something odd going on with the development PC I was using to run > the test. Not only was my sort running very slow, so were the tests > onhttp://tablesorter.com/docs/example-triggers.htmltablesorter.com . When I > switched to another machine, the sorts were damned near sub-second. > > Low-and-behold, I reboot the development machine and now it too sorts > quickly. > > Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. > > Sorry to waste your time. > > - Bryan > > > > csi95 wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > I've just started using tablesorter for one of my projects, and overall I > > love it. Does just what I need. > > > The one issue I've come across is that it's S-L-O-W! On a small table, > > it's just fine. Once I get up to about 400 rows, however, it takes a long > > time. 6 seconds before the list appears sorted, and another 10 seconds > > before I actually regain control of the browser (Firefox 3.08 / Win32 in > > this case). > > > Is this normal? Should it really take that long to sort 400 rows of data? > > > I could understand if it were 4,000 rows, but 400 doesn't seem like much. > > In fact it would probably be quicker to just do a round-trip to the server > > and let the database do the sorting. > > > I'm looking for some practical experience and / or suggestions from anyone > > who may be working with tablesorter on large tables. > > > Thanks! > > > - Bryan > > -- > View this message in > context:http://www.nabble.com/tablesorter-Speed-issues-tp22977435s27240p22979... > Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
