seems like there is some half way measures that needs to be cleaned up.. it's getting too late. My fix won't work but I'll take a second look in the morning. good night :)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:16 AM, dotnetCarpenter <ilaughlou...@gmail.com>wrote: > This is the same issue http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/2185 > > I'll investigate and see if I can fix all the inline-block and table-row > animiation bugs in 1.3.2 > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Anonymous <ilaughlou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Done :) >> >> From line 3889 to 3895 in >> http://static.telia.dk/lib/jQuery/jquery-1.3.1-mod.js >> >> Tested in small project in Opera9, Firefox 3, IE7, Chrome1, Safari3 on a >> windows Vista box. >> >> - dotnetCarpenter >> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Anonymous <ilaughlou...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> inline-block is well supported but widely misunderstood. Even IE6 >>> supports it and it is much cleaner than using float that breaks the document >>> flow. jQuery should support this but so far I haven't been able to find >>> anything. I might make a patch to 1.3.1 (unfortunately there is a regression >>> in 1.3.2 that I haven't had time to investigate)... >>> >>> Article about inline-block: http://www.search-this.com/2008/08/28/ >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:00 PM, ricardobeat <ricardob...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The inline-block property is not yet well-supported cross-browser. >>>> >>>> Use display:block, float:left, you'll get the same results (and spot >>>> some flaws in your layout too). >>>> >>>> In case someone is reading this: I suppose all animations in jQuery >>>> give the elements a display:block property? Is inline-block support >>>> coming in 1.3? >>>> >>>> - ricardo >>> >>> >>> >> >
