On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Webspeeder <dr...@bigrocksports.com> wrote:
> > Well, I finally got things to work. I ended up removing everything I > had and starting over. I also switched to the exploded version (not > the 'min' version) but I don't know if that's the issue because I > haven't tried the min since I got it to work. I figure if it's > working, I don't want to mess with it until I fully understand it. > > Now though, the onclick for tab is not working. Back to the pit I > go..... Just to be sure, are you using compatible versions of jQuery and jQuery UI jQuery UI 1.5.3 is only compatible with jQuery 1.2.6 jQuery UI 1.6rc6 is only compatible with jQuery 1.3+ I ask because when you have incompatible versions, it presents by just the symptom you've described: events not firing. - Richard > > > On Feb 25, 3:22 pm, brian <bally.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Richard D. Worth <rdwo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:06 PM, brian <bally.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> In my use, at least, I'm not including UI components in all views. > > >> And, when I do, there may be just one widget or whatever out of > > >> several that I might use. I could create several "personalized" > > >> files--one for each use case--but then I can't rely on the core file > > >> being cached because it's bundled up with several different widgets. > > >> And I'd require a personalized bundle for every combination I might > > >> want in future. Better, I think, to just include what I need, as I > > >> need it. > > > > > We're looking at a hybrid approach. Say if you select 3 plugins, it > would > > > include those 3 individual files, as well as a combined file that > contain > > > those 3 in 1. What do you think? > > > > Yeah, I'd like something like that. > > > > Don't get me wrong, though--I think the personalized bundles are a > > good idea for some situations. But, in my case, at least, I've only > > got a few places where I need UI stuff, and then only one thing or so > > at a time. I did consider creating bundles for each instance with a > > separate core file (so it'd be better cached) but ran into problems > > similar towebspeeder's. It seemed as if the bundle wasn't quite > > correct. And I'm pretty sure it was tabs also, as withwebspeeder. >
