Thanks for your feedback. With this project we wanted to create something that was interesting to but still functional without reliance on either JS or Flash. The end result, I hope, is a website that is functional and fully styled without JS turned on. With JS turned on, the site becomes more interactive and hopefully more engaging. For users with Flash 9 or above, more functionality is exposed, for example music, animated tooltips and the red people. What we didn't want was for any of the functionality to be dependant on Flash, that's where we draw the line.
In hindsight the home page scroll would have been a lot smoother and consistent across browsers, if done in Flash. That said, I'm still very happy with the result. I'm not sure what you mean by the "background fades" bug, but I have discovered the random woman between animations. Thanks again. Rich On Jan 29, 9:33 pm, Ricardo Tomasi <ricardob...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also had that problem. Sometimes I hover a + and it doesn't slide > down. Also experiencied two other bugs: > - when you click the + button, the background fades from black again > - inside a section like 'bar' or 'boutique hotel', when I click > another section (gym/pool/etc), an unrelated image flashes in the > background (a woman laying back in a chair) > > Very nice design. Do you develop in Flash too? Was it worth the extra > work to do it all in JS? > > cheers, > - ricardo > > On Jan 29, 6:54 pm, David Meiser <dmei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It has a nice user experience. However, you might want to think about the > > hoverintent plugin - things seemed "shaky" when I tried to click on them (eg > > - the animation kept moving when I wanted to hover over an item) in FF3. > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:58 PM, kim3er <rich...@dogma.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've just finished working on a new web site using jQuery 1.3.1 and > > > would appreciate feedback. > > > >http://www.highpointvillage.co.uk/ > > > > Rich
