Actually, quite the opposite. The living events provide a unique way
for handling callbacks. It'll actually trim down the amount of code
you use substantially. For 90% of the situations I can imagine, using
the generic live() binding cleans up the code, and makes it easier to
read/handle on my part. If you absolutely have to deviate for a click
function, you can always:

// Default
$('.someelement').live('default.click', function(){

});

$('#thiselement.').click(function(){
// .. Super custom
});

$('#thiselement').unbind('default.click');

If you namespace your live events, you can then unbind them if you
have a custom function to implement.

On Jan 27, 9:48 am, errant <d.cheka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric, thanks for response.
>
> Yes, it works that way, but it's kind of unflexible and may be
> impossible to implement when dealing with more complex code, don't you
> think?
>
> On 27 янв, 17:29, Eric Garside <gars...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I believe it has to do with the new event propogation model
> > implemented with 1.3
>
> > Instead, try using a living event:
>
> > <ul>
> >    <li></li>
> >    <li></li>
> >    <li></li>
> >    <li></li>
> >    <li></li>
> > </ul>
>
> > $('ul li span').live('click', function(){
> >    // ...
>
> > });
>
> > $('ul li').append('<span>Click me</span>');
>
> > That should work.
>
> > On Jan 27, 8:15 am, errant <d.cheka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Here is the code:
>
> > > HTML:
>
> > > <ul>
> > >         <li></li>
> > >         <li></li>
> > >         <li></li>
> > >         <li></li>
> > >         <li></li>
> > > </ul>
>
> > > JS:
>
> > > $(function(){
>
> > >         var handle = $('<span>Click me</span>');
> > >         handle.click(function() {
> > >                 alert('Thanks');
> > >         });
> > >         $('ul li').append(handle);
>
> > > });
>
> > > With jQuery 1.2.6, each time I click on any list's element it shows
> > > alert. With 1.3.1 in FF3, Safari 3 & Opera 9.63 alert is only
> > > displaying when I click on first element. In IE6,7 everything is ok.
> > > Is this some kind of bug?

Reply via email to