Totally and whole heartedly agree :) It was late and I was kinda only seeing new Image() method.
My bad.. Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Karl Swedberg <k...@englishrules.com> wrote: > On Jan 9, 2009, at 9:11 AM, jQuery Lover wrote: > > Here is something from top of my head: > > $(function () { > var imgs = new Array(); > imgs[0] = 'images1.jpg'; > imgs[2] = 'images2.jpg'; > imgs[3] = 'images3.jpg'; > imgs[4] = 'images4.jpg'; > imgs[5] = 'images5.jpg'; > > var $img = new Image(); > > for(var i in imgs){ > $($img) > .load(function () { > checkFinal(); > }) > .attr('src', imgs[i]); > } > > }); > > > The above seems a little overkill to me. I'm not sure why, for example, you > need to declare var imgs = new Array() and why you skip imgs[1]. Also, I > think it makes more sense to use a plain for loop rather than a for-in loop > when iterating through an array. I might be missing something, but couldn't > it be done more simply like this? ... > for (var i=1; i <= 5; i++) { > $('<img/>') > .attr('src', 'images'+i+'.jpg') > .load(function () { > checkFinal(); > }); > } > > --Karl
