sounds like someone wants to complain about his lack of a clue rather than get one.
--adam On Nov 19, 4:48 pm, Berke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been the sole developer for the last 9 months on a site that > was using ASP.Net Web Forms, & Component Art's Controls when I > inherited it since then I have added many of the controls from their > Ajax toolkit and within the last month have started using jquery. So > far I have had zero clashes, and now have a wide variety of tools to > solve the problems, I'm faced. I'm also starting to go back and clean > out my older pre jquery javascript. > > I've also had success using jquery to call wcf services & page methods > which a lot of success (there were some blog posts out there but I > don't have the links anymore). I am using all of these technologies > together in some of my more complex pages. > > On Nov 19, 12:34 pm, George Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I'm very surprised by his comments. We always rely on jQuery to get > > grips with the monster that is ASP.Net+AJAX.Net, regardless of project > > size. > > > jQuery's extraordiary convenience requires a slightly different > > mindset from conventional .net languages (one that I miss on the > > server side!) so perhaps the author could use some help to learn more > > about it. > > > On Nov 18, 9:52 pm, rolfsf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > is it truly a monster? > > >http://reddevnews.com/response/response.aspx?rdnid=1189-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
