The fixed size made a difference in the project I worked on. Get the test case up and running and I'll have a look ASAP :)
On Oct 15, 11:05 am, chadmichael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I've done some tests where I just make a small div with > nothing in it, set it to a fixed width and height, and it still has > poor performance. > > I think I may need to mock up some simple test cases. > > On Oct 14, 3:20 pm, Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I recently worked on a project that used a lot of draggable items > > combined with some sorting functionality. > > > There seemed to be major performance issues with FireFox 2 when we > > tried calculating things on the fly, as the items were dragged. The > > main culprit of this kind of problem is widths and heights of the > > elements you are dragging. > > > eg if all the items that could be dragged and sorted were different > > heights, that couldn't be a fixed value in CSS. jQuery would have to > > calculate all the heights of the items whilst performing the drag and > > sort, thus resulting in poor performance. > > > On Oct 14, 6:59 am, chadmichael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Firefox 2.0, Linux, I'm seeing horrible performance issues on a > > > draggable div. I thought it might be due to images in the div, but I > > > removed all of that and even a simple div with little content performs > > > poorly. Interestingly enough the demo on the jqueryUI site works > > > great. This makes me think it's something else on my page. > > > > My question is: what kinds of things could effect the performance of > > > the draggable?
