I should add that I probably wouldn't have gotten this right either. In fact, I was there at the time when the "index" argument was added to .each() and I didn't notice the problem myself - and I'd never heard of the new native [].forEach() yet.
But I do have 20/20 hindsight! ;-) -Mke > From: Michael Geary > > Actually, the original order chosen for the arguments to the > $(...).each() and $.each() callbacks was unfortunate. > callback(index,element) is backwards. It's rare that you need > the array index; what you want in almost every situation is > the array *element*.
