Yes, that's the correct location.

--Klaus


On 17 Jun., 01:49, Illah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Klaus,
>
> Thanks for the input - adding the ui-tabs-nav class prevents the flash
> of unstyled nav buttons, but the ui-tabs-panel class doesn't seem to
> be helping with the content within the tabs...it still seems to be
> waiting for the page to load before snapping the content into the
> tabs.  I'm adding the -panel class to the div id's targeted by the
> script, is that the correct location?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Sean
>
> On Jun 15, 5:33 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you want to prevent a flash of unstyled content, you can add the
> > classes that are added by the plugin right away to your HTML:
>
> > <ul class="ui-tabs-nav">...</ul>
>
> > <div class="ui-tabs-panel">...</div>
>
> > And in case you want to keep your panels hidden:
>
> > <div class="ui-tabs-panel ui-tabs-hide">...</div>
>
> > --Klaus
>
> > On 14 Jun., 06:12, Illah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Thanks for the feedback...so I guess I was correct in my assumption
> > > that the general page load was affecting the script?  The majority of
> > > that ~1MB page load is the images, and I can't really get rid of those
> > > (all the flash will be gone soon, it's part of an ad campaign ending
> > > this weekend).
>
> > > I checked out Texas Online and the dynamic load feature is a great
> > > idea.  My only concern is the my site is pretty visual and the images
> > > are a key feature, I worry about the user experience on an initial
> > > load...every time the carousel flips they'll have to watch another
> > > image load.  I'd almost rather a short pause up front than repetitive
> > > image load.
>
> > > Is there a way to prevent it from waiting for images to load, or to
> > > maybe put a 1px GIF in there to trick the script into thinking it has
> > > loaded already?
>
> > > --Illah
>
> > > On Jun 13, 5:49 pm, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hmm, I think it has to do with the enormous page weight (Firebug
> > > > calculates it at 1.05 MB).  I would look for an overall optimization
> > > > first to the site's weight (optimize images, clean up markup, pack/
> > > > minify javascript and/or CSS files at a minimum).
>
> > > > I ran into an issue with having to maintain an ultra low page weight
> > > > on a tabbed structure (containing 7 tabs) with each tab containing a
> > > > photo (additional weight).  I went with the plugin you've chosen
> > > > initially and found it did not suit my needs.  So I wrote a rather
> > > > clean and efficient (IMO) script that reduced the page weight by
> > > > almost 30%.
>
> > > > Check out the "Quick Answers" section of this site:
>
> > > >www.texasonline.com
>
> > > > View the source and the tabs in the global.js.  You'll notice that
> > > > each image is "dynamically" loaded thus reducing page weight.
>
> > > > Not sure if this is the solution, but I would think it's a start.
>
> > > > Cheers.
>
> > > > Joe
>
> > > >www.subprint.com
>
> > > > On Jun 13, 4:08 pm, Illah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > I'm a bit of a newb with JavaScript though pretty fluent in general
> > > > > xHTML/CSS web design.  Anyway, I use jQuery Tabs for the carousel on
> > > > > my site's homepage since I had prior experience with it.  It works
> > > > > just fine, though the only issue I'm having is that while the page is
> > > > > loading, the divs holding the content for each tab all show on the
> > > > > page, and on a slower connection it can hang like that for a few
> > > > > seconds before the script pops them into place.
>
> > > > > It's much easier to show an example:
>
> > > > >http://www.grooveeffect.com/
>
> > > > > Is there a way to optimize the tabs to prevent that?  As far as I can
> > > > > tell, the script is waiting for all the content to load before tab-
> > > > > ifying the content...can I force it to simply put everything into tabs
> > > > > whether loaded or not?
>
> > > > > If not, I'd be happy simply hiding all but the first tab until the
> > > > > rest load up.
>
> > > > > Thanks!
>
> > > > > --Illah

Reply via email to