I don't think W3C Validator checks injected dom.
Did you tried to validate the document from local?
--
Luca
On Jun 12, 3:06 pm, "Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a site in which I'm trying to get W3C validated and running
> into a few issue with jQuery and I wondered how people worked around
> stuff like this:
>
> Here I'm injecting some HTML into my site...
>
> // append a graphic * to the req'd fields
> $('.reqdfield').append('<img src="img/icons/reqdfield.gif" alt="This
> field is required" />');
>
> W3C validator complains about:
> ----------
> Line 20, Column 90: document type does not allow element "img" here.
> ...d.gif" alt="This field is required" />');
>
> The element named above was found in a context where it is not allowed.
> This could mean that you have incorrectly nested elements -- such as a
> "style" element in the "body" section instead of inside "head" -- or two
> elements that overlap (which is not allowed).
> ----------
>
> I've also got a few places where I have two form fields, one an
> autocomplete field, the other a static select field (I need to provide
> this for 508). I'm doing a show/hide with jQuery depending on if the
> user has JavaScript enabled, and the W3C validator complains about the
> fields having the same ID...
>
> Just curious how people are working around these type of isses using
> things like jQuery?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
